Robotic Hip Replacement Vs Traditional

The relative efficacy and safety of robotic assisted and conventional tha however are unclear.

Robotic hip replacement vs traditional. In the meantime people considering hip replacement surgery and their surgeons must make decisions. Is robotic assisted hip replacement right for everyone. Knee replacement using a robotic arm. Background robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty tha allows for accurate preoperative planning and component positioning potentially enhancing implant survival and long term outcomes.

1 6 this area of ongoing research is an example of how the medical field is continually evolving and trying to improve outcomes for patients. This systematic review and meta analysis compared the safety and efficacy of robotic assisted and conventional. The surgeon then uploads the images to the robotic software system to establish a plan for the surgery. Robotic surgery does help to minimize complications and speed recovery especially compared to traditional open surgery.

Ct imaging technology allows the surgeon to construct a three dimensional model of the joint. When this procedure is performed with the assistance of a robotic arm ct scan images are used instead of x rays. By jeremy reid md orthopedic surgeon virtua joint replacement institute. It frequently has been postulated that robotic reaming would result in an improved clinical outcome due to the better fit of the prosthesis but that has never been demonstrated in a prospective study to our knowledge.

Now with robotic assisted surgery hip replacement operations are overwhelmingly successful and downtime has dramatically decreased. Research on minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is mixed and it is not clear whether it has an advantage over traditional hip replacement surgery. However some surgeons performing complex or high risk surgeries still prefer the traditional method for many reasons including an emergency procedure or one in an area where there is a lot of scar tissue.